FAITH. TECHNOLOGY. PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY.

Reading path

Journalists & educators

Build a class, discussion or reported explanation around a question the evidence can answer. These routes also help students distinguish a persuasive demonstration from a supported conclusion.

Selected reading · Updated October 1, 2026

Start with a question · 1

Did AI improve the answer, or did the student learn?

The Christian-schools analysis compares different learning studies and a workload evaluation. Keep their settings and measures separate, then ask students what they can explain without assistance.

Analysis
When AI solves the maths, what should Christian schools still teach?

Published 2026-09-30 · Source 2026-09-30

Start with a question · 2

What is a proposal, and what has actually been tested?

Use the pastoral-AI paper as a source-reading exercise. Identify the proposed safeguards, then ask what evidence a classroom trial would need before anyone could claim success.

Report
New pastoral-AI paper draws boundaries around religious-learning chatbots

Published 2026-10-01 · Published and version of record October 1, 2026; historical context retains original dates

Start with a question · 3

How do we explain an AI image without turning it into evidence?

The religious-images guide separates illustration, impersonation and claims about real events. Apply that distinction to a lesson, caption or headline and identify what the original source can establish.

Explainer
An AI religious image is not evidence of an event

Background · Updated 2026-09-27

Put it into practice

Ask each participant to bring one claim and its source. Compare the evidence, discuss a fair alternative interpretation, and state one conclusion the source cannot support.

Keep exploring

All free resources and reading paths