FAITH. TECHNOLOGY. PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY.
Research library

News brief

Muslim AI curriculum webinar focuses on preparing local discussions

The announced programme for a November 9 online session introduces the Religious Voices and Responsible AI curriculum through Muslim perspectives. Its focus is preparing community discussion, not demonstrating proven results.

AI-generated illustration of an adult woman in a teal hijab preparing index cards beside a laptop in an imagined community room.
Editorial illustration
AI Faith Monitor

Published 2026-11-09 · 2 min read · AI-assisted reporting

Webinar scheduled for November 9, 2026; IST project listing dated October 21; organizer pages rechecked November 9; programme coverage, not confirmation of proceedings or outcomes · Source checked 2026-11-09

Preparing a community conversation

The announced programme for a November 9 webinar from the Institute for Security and Technology and AI and Faith introduces the Muslim perspectives in their Religious Voices and Responsible AI curriculum. Organizers scheduled the online session for noon Eastern / 9 a.m. Pacific, with an agenda addressing why the course was developed, its use in local discussion and preparation for facilitators. Source: securityandtechnology.org

The listed participants are curriculum co-authors Fatima Faisal Khan, Mahan Mirza and Ali-Reza Bhojani, alongside pilot facilitator Munir Jiwa. The inclusion of both writers and a facilitator makes implementation a concrete subject for the session, rather than leaving the announcement at the level of broad ethical aspirations. It does not establish how well the materials worked. Source: securityandtechnology.org

Materials and ambitions are not outcomes

AI and Faith’s project description identifies discussion guides, short videos and reading lists as the planned educational resources. It describes pilots for Christian churches in Southern California and mosques in the San Francisco Bay Area and Seattle area. That page uses prospective language and should not be read as a completed evaluation. Source: aiandfaith.org

The organizers frame the wider effort as helping religious communities understand AI and contribute to policy discussions. This is a stated aim, not evidence that participants have influenced policy or improved their understanding. AI and Faith says it plans to make the webinar available afterward through IST’s website, YouTube and the project website. A planned recording is useful for readers unable to attend, but its publication remains to be confirmed. Source: aiandfaith.org

Questions worth bringing

For prospective facilitators, a useful listening checklist is specific: What prior technical knowledge does the course assume? How are disagreements handled? Which examples can be discussed without exposing personal information? What would show that participants can assess an AI claim rather than repeat the presenter’s answer? These are AI Faith Monitor’s suggested questions, not a summary of answers already supplied by the curriculum.

Christian educators can use the same preparation questions while listening carefully to the Muslim perspectives on their own terms. Shared concern about AI does not make different traditions’ teachings interchangeable. A church considering its own discussion should identify which educational methods it can learn from and which religious claims require interpretation within its own community.

The announced schedule and what remains unchecked

IST’s project index dates the Muslim webinar listing to October 21. This report examines the announced programme for November 9, not a newly launched initiative or a verified account of the session. We have not confirmed whether the webinar proceeded as scheduled or reviewed a recording. The full curriculum, registration availability and learning outcomes have not been assessed; no participant interviews inform this report. Source: securityandtechnology.org

Sources & method

Institute for Security and Technology: Sharing Muslim Perspectives webinar

What this article establishes

Source-led programme brief based on inspected organizer event and project pages. No attendance, interviews, curriculum assessment, registration-capacity check or evaluation of pilot outcomes. Suggested facilitator questions and Christian educational application are explicitly editorial reasoning. Produced with AI assistance under human editorial direction. The editor shapes the coverage and takes responsibility for the final published content. AI-generated editorial illustration of an imagined community educator preparing for a webinar, not an actual participant or event.

How we use AI · Evidence standards

Related reading

An imagined Jewish educator workshop table with game pieces, planning cards, a notebook and laptop.
Editorial illustration

News brief / Faith & religious life

Jewish Futures program puts AI, games and educators’ choices on the same agenda

The October 26 program connects AI possibilities with learning design and educators’ decisions. This is advance coverage, not a report of classroom outcomes.

Published 2026-10-23 · Upcoming event October 26, 2026; organizer program checked October 23; page publication date not stated

An imagined church meeting room with an empty round table, laptop and notebooks.
Editorial illustration

News brief / Faith & religious life

Anglican AI policy work includes Indigenous knowledge and workers

An October progress report follows an August mandate in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Polynesia. The work is beginning, not a finished AI policy.

Published 2026-10-23 · Progress report October 20, 2026; adopted motion August 20; initial online meeting described as the preceding week, exact date not stated

An imagined English parish room with empty chairs, a laptop, notebooks and a church newsletter.
Editorial illustration

News brief / Faith & religious life

England ecumenical report puts quiet church AI adoption on the agenda

An October 22 account asks churches to discuss AI before its use becomes routine, pointing to existing guidance rather than announcing a new policy.

Published 2026-10-23 · Meeting report October 22, 2026; meeting described only as October; AICP guidelines launched July 14, 2026; current PDF revision date not established